Delegation 28: Relegation Tied

**The Importance of Relegation: A Case Study of the 2015-2016 U.S. Congress Session**

Relegation, the process of returning members of the U.S. Congress who have been elected without serving in their home state for several years, is a critical aspect of U.S. political life. The 2015-2016 session, known as Delegation 28, was a significant event in this process, featuring the re-election of over 100 members who had previously served in other states.

During this session, many members were re-eligible, meaning they were eligible to vote in the 2016 election. Notably, members like Bob Gooden, Jim Hontz, and others were re-elected, while members like Jim Lambert, who remained in his home state of Colorado, were also re-eligible but not re-elected. This highlights the complexity of the re-eligibility process, which involves extensive debates and considerations.

The U.S. Congress's efforts to restore home states were marked by the passage of several bills and debates that aimed to address the challenges of re-eligibility. These debates often led to compromises, such as the inclusion of provisions to ensure that members who have moved states are re-elected if they remain in their new states for a minimum of three consecutive years.

The 2015-2016 session was a turning point, as it marked the beginning of the process of re-eligibility for many members. However, the process remains ongoing, with ongoing debates addressing the issues raised during this session and beyond.

In conclusion, the 2015-2016 session was a crucial step in the U.S. Congress's effort to restore home states, showcasing the ongoing efforts to ensure representation and diversity within Congress. The process continues to evolve, with the ultimate goal of restoring the home state of every U.S. representative.